NC74392 said:
On "Hull not in Motion" insurance-
1) How does no time in type affect the rate?
2) Does that cover it if it were still in my garage under reconstruction, or just at the A/P?
3) What's "reasonable"?
1) Insurance companies work off a set of metrics that over time set the odds in their favor. Some things they look at are TT, tail wheel time, complex time, time in type, and if you’re not geriatric. If you’re low in these times or over a certain age you pay more or are uninsurable.
2) "Not in motion" is cheaper than standard hull insurance. Mine includes standard liability. If you’re not flying some insurance companies have a storage policy. Liability is much cheaper; I'm not certain how hull insurance is affected by a storage policy. You'll have to ask.
3) My view is that when you buy insurance at a given price you're betting you will have an accident. When the insurance company sells you a policy it is betting you will not have an accident.
While metrics in the first paragraph may happen to apply to a large population, they do not apply to everyone. I know and have flown/instructed with 80+ year old pilots and younger low time pilots with good judgment and standards with respect to weather, who understand human factors, have good skills, have little time in type, they know how to manage maintenance, stay current, and they are excellent low risk pilots. The metrics the insurance companies use for quotes are unreasonable for these pilots, if they can even get a quote. Probably a slight minority of the pilot population.
On the other hand, there are those that meet the metrics, but lack standards, skills, currency, and attitude to be safe. Probably also a slight minority of the pilot population.
Most are probably between these extremes.
By determining the group you're in you can conclude the reasonableness of the quotes you get.